Feasibility of using a continuous direct observation technique for assessment of free-living physical activity in young adults

Autores

  • Jeffer Eidi Sasaki University of Massachusetts Amherst
  • Dinesh John University of Massachusetts Amherst
  • Amanda Hickey University of Massachusetts Amherst
  • Kate Lyden University of Massachusetts Amherst
  • Todd Hagobian California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA
  • Patty Freedson University of Massachusetts Amherst

Palavras-chave:

physical activity assessment, free-living conditions, criterion measure

Resumo

Objective: To demonstrate the feasibility and application of ‘continuous focal sampling’ direct observation (CFS DO) for physical activity (PA) measurement in free-living adults. Methods: Nine observers were trained to use CFS DO and completed two video-based examinations to evaluate observer reliability. We applied the method in free-living conditions by recording activity type and intensity among thirty college-aged students during 11.1 ± 1.0 hr observation periods. Results: Percent correct classification of activity type and intensity by the observers were 86.6 ± 6.5% and 76.1 ± 15.4%, respectively. Test-retest reliability coefficients for activity type and activity intensity were r = .79 and r = .78. Based on CFS DO measures, participants spent 57.4% and 15.5% of the time sitting and walking. Mean time spent in sedentary, light, moderate, and vigorous physical activity intensities were 359.6 ± 100.1, 178.8 ± 107.3, 85.4 ± 63.1, and 24.6 ± 24.6 min for the 11.1 ± 1.0 hr observation period. Conclusion: The CFS DO technique was reliable for assessment of free-living PA in the current study. Feasibility of CFS DO may be limited to shorter blocks of observation (2-3 hr).

Biografia do Autor

Jeffer Eidi Sasaki, University of Massachusetts Amherst

Department of Kinesiology

Physical Activity and Health Laboratory

Dinesh John, University of Massachusetts Amherst

Department of Kinesiology

Physical Activity and Health Laboratory

Amanda Hickey, University of Massachusetts Amherst

Department of Kinesiology

Physical Activity and Health Laboratory

Kate Lyden, University of Massachusetts Amherst

Department of Kinesiology

Physical Activity and Health Laboratory

Todd Hagobian, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA

Kinesiology Department

Patty Freedson, University of Massachusetts Amherst

Department of Kinesiology

Physical Activity and Health Laboratory

Referências

Bonnefoy M, Normand S, Pachiaudi C, Lacour JR, Laville M, Kostka T. Simultaneous validation of ten physical activity questionnaires in older men: a doubly labeled water study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2001 Jan;49(1):28–35.

Ekelund U, Yngve A, Westerterp K, Sjöström M. Energy expenditure assessed by heart rate and doubly labeled water in young athletes. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002 Aug;34(8):1360–6.

Plasqui G, Westerterp KR. Physical activity assessment with accelerometers: an evaluation against doubly labeled water. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2007 Oct;15(10):2371–9.

Brown WH, Pfeiffer KA, Mclver KL, Dowda M, Almeida MJCA, Pate RR. Assessing preschool children’s physical activity: the Observational System for Recording Physical Activity in children-preschool version. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2006 Jun;77(2):167–76.

Heath EM, Coleman KJ, Lensegrav TL, Fallon JA. Using momentary time sampling to estimate minutes of physical activity in physical education: validation of scores for the system for observing fitness instruction time. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2006 Mar;77(1):142–6.

Klesges RC, Coates TJ, Moldenhauer-Klesges LM, Holzer B, Gustavson J, Barnes J. The FATS: An observational system for assessing physical activity in children and associated parent behavior. Behavioral Assessment. 1984;6(4):333–45.

McKenzie TL, Sallis JF, Nader PR. SOFIT: System for Observing Fitness Instruction Time. J Teach Phys Educ. 1991 Jan 10;11(2):195–205.

O’Hara NM, Baranowski T, Simons-Morton BG, Wilson BS, Parcel G. Validity of the observation of children’s physical activity. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1989 Mar;60(1):42–7.

Puhl J, Greaves K, Hoyt M, Baranowski T. Children’s Activity Rating Scale (CARS): description and calibration. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1990 Mar;61(1):26–36.

Sit CHP, Lam JWK, McKenzie TL. Direct observation of children’s preferences and activity levels during interactive and online electronic games. J Phys Act Health. 2010 Jul;7(4):484–9.

Keating XD, Kulinna PH, Silverman S. Measuring Teaching Behaviors, Lesson Context, and Physical Activity in School Physical Education Programs: Comparing the SOFIT and the C-SOFIT Instruments. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science. 1999;3(4):207–20.

McKenzie TL, Marshall SJ, Sallis JF, Conway TL. Leisure-time physical activity in school environments: an observational study using SOPLAY. Prev Med. 2000 Jan;30(1):70–7.

Altmann J. Observational Study of Behavior: Sampling Methods. Behaviour. 1974;49(3-4):227–66.

Powell J, Martindale A, Kulp S. An evaluation of time-sample measures of behavior. J Appl Behav Anal. 1975;8(4):463–9.

Tacha TC, Vohs PA, Iverson GC. A Comparison of Interval and Continuous Sampling Methods for Behavioral Observations. Journal of Field Ornithology. 1985 Jul 1;56(3):258–64.

Lyden K, Petruski N, Mix S, Staudenmayer J, Freedson PS. Validation of direct observation for estimating physical activity and sedentary behavior in a free-living setting. J Phys Act Health. 2012;In press.

Vanhees L, Lefevre J, Philippaerts R, Martens M, Huygens W, Troosters T, et al. How to assess physical activity? How to assess physical fitness? European Journal of Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation. 2005 Apr 1;12(2):102–14.

Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Whitt MC, Irwin ML, Swartz AM, Strath SJ, et al. Compendium of physical activities: an update of activity codes and MET intensities. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000 Sep;32(9 Suppl):S498–504.

Bonomi AG, Goris AHC, Yin B, Westerterp KR. Detection of type, duration, and intensity of physical activity using an accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009 Sep;41(9):1770–7.

Freedson PS, Lyden K, Kozey-Keadle S, Staudenmayer J. Evaluation of artificial neural network algorithms for predicting METs and activity type from accelerometer data: validation on an independent sample. J Appl Physiol. 2011 Dec;111(6):1804–12.

John D, Liu S, Sasaki JE, Howe CA, Staudenmayer J, Gao RX, et al. Calibrating a novel multi-sensor physical activity measurement system. Physiol Meas. 2011 Sep;32(9):1473–89.

Staudenmayer J, Pober D, Crouter S, Bassett D, Freedson P. An artificial neural network to estimate physical activity energy expenditure and identify physical activity type from an accelerometer. J Appl Physiol. 2009 Oct;107(4):1300–7.

Bassett DR Jr, Rowlands A, Trost SG. Calibration and validation of wearable monitors. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012 Jan;44(1 Suppl 1):S32–8.

Strath SJ, Bassett DR Jr, Swartz AM. Comparison of MTI accelerometer cut-points for predicting time spent in physical activity. Int J Sports Med. 2003 May;24(4):298–303.

Kozey-Keadle S, Libertine A, Lyden K, Staudenmayer J, Freedson PS. Validation of wearable monitors for assessing sedentary behavior. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011 Aug;43(8):1561–7.

Troiano RP, Berrigan D, Dodd KW, Mâsse LC, Tilert T, McDowell M. Physical activity in the United States measured by accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008 Jan;40(1):181–8.

Publicado

2017-01-22

Edição

Seção

Artigos originais