ANT POPULATION DYNAMIC IN PISCICULTURE AS TOOL TO ASSESS THE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

Authors

  • Derick Batista Silva
  • Taina Pedroso Silva
  • Sarah Ladeia Cavalari
  • Milaine Fernandes dos Santos

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18554/acbiobras.v7i2.8048

Keywords:

economic activity, Dorymyrmex, environmental indicators, environmental management

Abstract

Human activities impacts the biodiversity and consequently interferes with the balance and maintenance of ecosystem services. In this context, biological indicators can be explored as a tool to monitor and to evaluate the environmental quality. The present study aims to assess the population dynamic of ants in a pisciculture in Alto Pantanal, Cáceres-MT, Brazil. Collections were carried out quarterly for a year in the area surrounding the pisciculture tanks and area surrounding a fragment near to the pisciculture tanks. In both areas, the ants were captured using a pitfall traps. Generalized linear models were used to analyze the abundance and richness genera, as well as, the interaction with the local environmental variables such as luminosity, soil temperature and soil humidity. We collected 3707 ants, distributed across 7 subfamilies and 10 genera, with Dorymyrmex being the most common in the both areas. Ant abundance was statistically different between the areas. However, we did not found statistical differences for the richness or in the relationship between the abundance and richness with the local environmental variables. In areas with pisciculture, the ants can be used as a tool to monitor the environmental impact caused by tanks installation. The occurrence of Dorymyrmex in the both areas of investigation indicates the need to implement strategies for the conservation of biodiversity, since this genus occurs abundantly in anthropic areas.

References

Himshikha S D, Ayate D, Lal P. Influence of Anthropogenic Activities on the Biological Diversity of Forest Ecosystem. In: Rani, M., Chaudhary, B.S., Jamal, S., Kumar, P. (eds) Towards Sustainable Natural Resources. Springer, Cham. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06443-2_12.

Joly CA, Scarano FR, Bustamante M, Gadda TMC, Metzger JPW, Seixas CS, Ometto JPHB, Pires APF, Boesing AL, Sousa FDR, Quintão JMB, Gonçalves LR, Padgurschi MCG, Aquino MFS, Castro PFD, Santos IL. Brazilian assessment on biodiversity and ecosystem services: summary for policy makers. Biota neotropica. 2019;19(4): e20190865. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1676-0611-BN-2019-0865.

Garrett RD, Koh I, Lambin EF, Warouxe YLP, Kastensf JH, Brown JC. Intensification in agriculture-forest frontiers: Land use responses to development and conservation policies in Brazil. Global Environmental Change. 2018; 53: 233–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.09.011.

Gullan P J, Cranston P.S. Insetos: fundamentos da entomologia. Rio de Janeiro: Rocca; 2017.

Triplehorn CA, Johnson N F. Estudo dos insetos. São Paulo: Cengage Learning; 2015.

Dornelas M, Daskalova GN. Nuanced changes in insect abundance. Science. 2020; 368 (6489): 368–369. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abb6861.

Hallmann CA, Sorg M, Jongejans E, Siepel H, Hofland N, Schwan H, Stenmans W, Müller A, Sumser H, Hörren T, Goulson D, Kroon H. More than 75 percent decline over 27 years in total flying insect biomass in protected areas. PLoS ONE. 2017; 12 (10): e0185809. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0185809.

Seibold S, Gossner MM, Simons NK, Blüthgen N, Müller J, Ambarli D, Ammer C, Bauhus J, Fischer M, Habel JC, Linsenmair KE, Nauss T, Penone C, Prati D, Schall P, Schulze ED, Vogt J, Wöllauer S, Weisser WW. Arthropod decline in grasslands and forests is associated with landscape-level drivers. Nature. 2019; 574: 671–674. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1684-3.

Cantonati M, Poikane S, Pringle CM, Stevens LE, Turak E, Heino J, Richardson JS, Bolpagni R, Borrini A, Cid N, Ctvrtlíková M, Galassi DMP, Hájek M, Hawes I, Levkov Z, Naselli-Flores L, Saber AA, Mattia Di Cicco, Fiasca B, Hamilton PB, Kubecka J, Segadelli S, Znachor P. Characteristics, Main Impacts, and Stewardship of Natural and Artificial Freshwater Environments: Consequences for Biodiversity Conservation. Water. 2020; 12 (1): 260. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12010260.

Sánchez-Bayo F, Wyckhuys, KAG. Worldwide decline of the entomofauna: A review of its drivers. Biological Conservation. 2019; 232: 8–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.01.020.

Bolton B. 2024. An Online Catalog of the Ants of the World, http://www.antcat.org . Accessed on 21 Maio 2024.

Guénard B. 2013. An Overview of the Species and Ecological Diversity of Ants. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470015902.a0023598. Accessed on 21 Maio 2024.

Feitosa RM, Camacho GP, Silva TSR, Ulysséa MA, Ladino N, Oliveira AM, Albuquerque EZ, Schmidt FA, Ribas CR, Nogueira A, Baccaro FB, Queiroz ACM, Dáttilo W, Silva RR, Santos JC, Rabello AM, Morini MSC, Quinet YP, Del-Claro K, Harada AY, Carvalho KS, Sobrinho TG, Moraes AB, Vargas AB, Torezan-Silingardi HM, Souza JLP, Marques T, Izzo T, Lange D, Santos IA, Nahas L, Paolucci L, Soares SA, Costa-Milanez CB, Diehl-Fleig E, Campos RBF, Solar R, Frizzo T, Darocha W. Systematics and Biodiversity. 2022; 20 (1): 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/14772000.2022.2089268.

Guénard B, Weiser M D, Gómez K, Nitish N, Economo E P. The Global Ant Biodiversity Informatics (GABI) database: Synthesizing data on the geographic distribution of ant species (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrmecological News. 2017; 24: 83–89. https://doi.org/10.25849/myrmecol.news_024:083.

Kass JM, Guénard B, Dudley K L, Jenkins CN, Azuma F, Fisher BL, Parr CL, Gibb H, Longino JT, Ward PS, Chao A, Lubertazzi D, Weiser M, Jetz W, Guralnick R, Blatrix R, Lauriers JD, Donoso DA, Georgiadis C, Gomez K, Hawkes PG, Johnson RA, Lattke JE, MacGown JA, Mackay W, Robson S, Sanders NJ, Dunn RR, Economo EP. The global distribution of known and undiscovered ant biodiversity. Science advances. 2022; 8(31): eabp9908. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abp9908.

Schultheiss P, Nooten SS, Wang R, Wong MK, Brassard F, Guénard B. The abundance, biomass, and distribution of ants on Earth. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2022; 119(40): e2201550119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2201550119.

Del Toro I, Ribbons RR, Ellison AM. Ant-mediated ecosystem functions on a warmer planet: Effects on soil movement, decomposition and nutrient cycling. Journal of Animal Ecology. 2015; 84(5): 1233–1241. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12367.

Hosaka T, Di L, Eguchi K, Numata S. Ant assemblages on littered food waste and food removal rates in urban–suburban parks of Tokyo. Basic and applied ecology. 2019; 37:1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2019.04.002.

Lopes JFS, Ribeiro LF, Brugger M S, Camargo RS, Caldato N, Forti LC. Internal architecture and population size of Acromyrmex subterraneus molestans (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) nests: Comparison between a rural and an urban area. Sociobiology. 2011; 58(3): 593–605.

Perfecto I, Philpott S M. Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and ecosystem functions and services in urban areas: a reflection on a diverse literature. Myrmecological News. 2023; 33: 103–122. https://doi.org/10.25849/myrmecol.news_033:103.

Philpott S M, Bichier P. Local and landscape drivers of predation services in urban gardens. Ecological Applications. 2017; 27(3), 966–976. https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.1500.

De Queiroz ACM, Rabello AM, Braga DL, Santiago GS, Zurlo LF, Philpott SM, Ribas CR. Cerrado vegetation types determine how land use impacts ant biodiversity. Biodiversity and Conservation. 2020; 29(6): 2017–2034. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-017-1379-8.

Jiménez-Carmona F, Heredia-Arévalo AM, Reyes-López JL. Ants (Hymenoptera?: Formicidae) as an indicator group of human environmental impact in the riparian forests of the Guadalquivir river. Ecological Indicators. 2020; 118: 106762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106762.

Majeed W, Khawaja M, Rana N. Assessing fluctuation of ant populations in a distinct ecological habitat for the purpose of tracking climate change effects. Biodiversitas. 2021; 22(5): 2722–2727. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d220533.

Nickele MA, Filho WR, Rocio S, Penteado C, Queiroz EC, Silva LCR, Camargo TS, Casadei-Ferreira A, Feitosa RM, Pie MR. Assessing forest restoration effectiveness in the Seasonal Semideciduous Forest in the Upper Paraná Atlantic Forest ecoregion using epigaeic ant assemblages. Journal of Tropical Ecology. 2023; 39(e37): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266467423000275.

Souza RT, Santos RF, Genovez AIB, Genovez AM. Environmental impacts resulting from construction of a pisciculture installation in Juquiá and region, Brazil. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal. 2000; 18(4): 335–340. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154600781767268.

Aguiar ACF, Scarano FR, Bozelli RL, Branco PD, Ceotto P, Farjalla VF. Business, biodiversity, and innovation in Brazil. Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation. 2023; 21(1): 6–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecon.2022.12.002.

Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística – IBGE. Dados sobre os Municípios Brasileiros, 2002. Disponível em: http://www.ibge.gov.br. Acesso em 25/07/2024.

Neves, SMAS, Nunes MCM, Neves RJ. Caracterização das condições climáticas de Cáceres/MT-Brasil, no período de 1971 a 2009: subsídio às atividades agropecuárias e turísticas municipais. Boletim Goiana de Geografia. 2011; 31: 55-68. https://doi.org/10.5216/bgg.v31i2.16845.

Baccaro FB, Feitosa RM, Fernández F, Solar R. Guia para os gêneros de formigas do Brasil. Editora INPA, 2015. 388 p. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.32912.

Melo TSM, Moreira EFM, Lopes MVAL, Andrade ARSA, Brescovit ADB, Peres, MC LP. Influence of Urban Landscape on Ants and Spiders Richness and Composition in Forests. Neotrop Entomol. 2021;50: 32–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13744-020-00824-4.

Franks NR, Stuttard JP, Doran C, Esposito JC, Master M C, Sendova-Franks AB, Masuda N, Britton NF. How ants use quorum sensing to estimate the average quality of a fluctuating resource. Scientific Reports. 2015; 5: 11890. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep11890.

Viles HA, Goudie AS, Goudie AM. Ants as geomorphological agents: A global assessment. Earth-Science Reviews. 2021; 213: 103469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103469.

Dantas A, Roberto C. Synergistic effect of habitat loss and chronic anthropogenic disturbances on ant species richness. Biodiversity and Conservation. 2024; 33: 205–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-023-02743-3.

Westall F, Brack A. The Importance of Water for Life. Space Sci Rev. 2018; 214: 50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-018-0476-7.

Pereda-Gomez M E, Pessacq P, Elizalde L. Stress-tolerant ants and the impact of quarries on an ant community in Patagonia. Journal of Arid Environments. 2020; 173: 104017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2019.104017.

Barral-Martinez, M, Fraga-Corral M, Garcia-Perez P, Simal-Gandara J, Prieto MA. Almond By-Products: Valorization for Sustainability and Competitiveness of the Industry. Foods. 2021; 10: 1793. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10081793.

Abbass K, Qasim MZ, Song H, Murshed M, Mahmood H, Younis I. A review of the global climate change impacts, adaptation, and sustainable mitigation measures. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2022; 29: 42539–42559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19718-6.

Published

2024-10-01

How to Cite

Silva, D. B. ., Silva, T. P. ., Cavalari , S. L. ., & dos Santos, M. F. . (2024). ANT POPULATION DYNAMIC IN PISCICULTURE AS TOOL TO ASSESS THE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY. Acta Biologica Brasiliensia, 7(2), 46–57. https://doi.org/10.18554/acbiobras.v7i2.8048

Issue

Section

Artigos