EFFICACY OF A PRATICAL HOOP-NET TRAPS MODEL INTHE CAPTURE OF FRESHWATER TURTLES, WITHSUGGESTION OF SAMPLING PROTOCOLS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18554/acbiobras.v2i2.8669Keywords:
: inventory, sampling, side-neck turtles, Testudines, turtleAbstract
Freshwater turtles remain little known in many regions of Brazil and have been
neglected in faunal surveys, which in part runs from the difficulties of using traditional traps in sampling. We have analyzed the effectiveness of a practical and easy to obtain hoop-net trap model. Three sizes of traps baited with canned sardines were analyzed in standardized samplings (910 traps, 380 points, 1685 traps-days
effort) and non-standard samples, conducted in lentic and lotic environments in the Cerrado, Atlantic Forest and Amazon, Brazil. Eleven species belonging to four
families of chelonians were captured, including 148 specimens in the standardized samples. The hoop-net trap model was effective in the capture of several freshwater species, especially with great sampling effort, and canned sardines were attractive.
The model was also effective in the various lentic and lotic environments sampled. In the standardized samples the capture rate was 9.23% and the stay period of 01 day was more efficient (capture rate: 60.20%) than 02 days (39.80%). In nonstandard samples, there was satisfactory success with a residence period of 04 hours. The capture rate varied from 4.86% to 14.32% between the different hoop
trap sizes. Based on the results we propose sampling protocols with the hoop-net trap model tested in rapid and long studies.
References
(1) Souza, FL. 2004. Uma revisão sobre padrões de atividade, reprodução e alimentação de cágados brasileiros (Testudines, Chelidae). Phyllomedusa. 3 (1): DOI: https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2316-9079.v3i1p15-27
15-27.
(2) Cantarelli, VH; Malvasio, A; Verdade, LM. 2014. Brazil's Podocnemis expansa
Conservation Program: Retrospective and future directions. Chelonian Conservation and Biology. 13 (1): 124-128.
(3) Vogt, RC. Tartarugas da Amazônia. Lima: Walter H. Wust, 2008.
(4) Guix, JC; Miranda, JR; Nunes, VS. 1992. Observaciones sobre la ecologia de
Hydromedusa maximiliani. Boletín de la Asociación Herpetológica Española. 3:
23-25.
(5) Martins, FI; Souza, FL. 2008. Estimates of growth of the Atlantic Rain Forest
freshwater turtle Hydromedusa maximiliani (Chelidae). Journal of Herpetology. 42 (1): 54-60.
(6) Souza, FL; Abe, AS. 1995. Observations on feeding habits of Hydromedusa
maximiliani (Testudines: Chelidae) in southeastern Brazil. Chelonian Conservation and Biology. 1: 320-322.
(7) Souza, FL; Abe, AS. 1997a. Seasonal variation in the feeding habits of
Hydromedusa maximiliani (Testudines, Chelidae). Boletín de la Asociación
Herpetológica Española. 8: 17-20.
(8) Souza, FL; Abe, AS. 1997b. Population structure, activity, and conservation of
the Neotropical freshwater turtle, Hydromedusa maximiliani, in Brazil. Chelonian
Conservation and Biology. 2: 521-525.
(9) Souza, FL; Abe, AS. 1998. Resource partitioning by the Neotropical freshwater turtle, Hydromedusa maximiliani. Journal of Herpetology. 32 (1): 106-112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1565488
(10) Brito, ES; Strussmann, C; Baicere-Silva, C. 2009. Courtship behavior of
Mesoclemmys vanderhaegei (Bour, 1973) (Testudines: Chelidae) under natural
conditions in the Brazilian Cerrado. Herpetology Notes. 2: 67-72.
(11) Brito, ES; Strussmann, C; Penha, JMF. 2009. Population structure of
Mesoclemmys vanderhaegei (Bour, 1973) (Testudines: Chelidae) in the Cerrado of Chapada dos Guimarães, Mato Grosso, Brazil. Biota Neotropica. 9 (4): 1-4.
(12) Bujes, CS. 1998. Atividade de nidificação de Phrynops hilarii Duméril & Bibron (Testudines, Chelldae) na Reserva Biológica do Lami, Rio Grande do Sul, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-81751998000400010
Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia. 15 (4): 921-928.
(13) Bujes, CS; Verrastro, L. 2009. Nest temperature, incubation time, hatching,
and emergence in the Hilaire’s side-necked turtle (Phrynops hilarii). Herpetological Conservation and Biology. 4 (3): 306-312.
(14) Fagundes, CK; Bager, A. 2007. Ecologia reprodutiva de Hydromedusa tecifera (Testudines: Chelidae) no sul do Brasil. Biota Neotropica. 7 (2): 179-184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1676-06032007000200021
(15) Magnusson, WE; Lima, AC; Costa, VL; Vogt, RC. 1997. Home range of the
turtle Phrynops rufipes in an isolated reserve in Central Amazônia, Brazil. Chelonian Conservation and Biology. 2 (4): 494-499.
(16) Souza, FL; Abe, AS. 2000. Feeding ecology, density and biomass of the
freshwater turtle, Phrynops geoffroanus, inhabiting a polluted urban river in southeastern Brazil. Journal of Zoology. 252 (4): 437-446. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952836900000194
(17) Souza, FL; Abe, AS. 2001. Population structure and reproductive aspects of
the freshwater turtle, Phrynops geoffroanus, inhabiting an urban river in
Southeastern Brazil. Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment. 36 (1): 57-62.
(18) Pavan, D; Dizo, M. 2004. A herpetofauna da área de influência do reservatório da Usina Hidrelétrica Luís Eduardo Magalhães, Palmas, TO. Humanitas. 4/6: 13-30.
(19) Recoder, RS; Teixeira Jr, M; Camacho, A; Nunes, PMS; Mott, T; Valdujo, PH;
Ghellere, JM; Nogueira, C; Rodrigues, MT. 2011. Répteis da Estação Ecológica
Serra Geral do Tocantins, Brasil Central. Biota Neotropica. 11 (1): 263-282.
(20) Santos, DL; Andrade, SP; Victor Jr, EP; Vaz-Silva, W. 2014. Amphibians and
reptiles from southeastern Goiás, Central Brazil. Check List. 10 (1): 131-148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15560/10.1.131
(21) Silva Jr, NJ; Cintra, CED; Silva, HLR; Costa, MC; Souza, CA; Pachêco Jr,
AA; Gonçalves, FA. 2009. Herpetofauna, Ponte de Pedra Hydroelectric Power
Plant, states of Mato Grosso and Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil. Check List. 5 (3):
518-525.
(22) Vaz-Silva, W; Guedes, AG; Azevedo-Silva, PL; Gontijo, FF; Barbosa, RS; Aloísio, GR; Oliveira, FCG. 2007. Herpetofauna, Espora Hydroelectric Power
Plant, state of Goiás, Brazil. Check List. 3 (4): 338-345.
(23) Lagler, KF. 1943. Methods of collecting freshwater turtles. Copeia. 1943 (1): DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1437875
21-25.
(24) Lovich, RF. Techniques for reptiles in difficult-to-sample habitats, pp. 167-
196. In: Mcdiarmind, RW; Foster, MS; Guyer, C; Gibbons, JW; Chernoff, N eds.
Reptile Biodiversity: standard methods for inventory and monitoring. Berkeley /
Los Angeles / Londres: University of California Press. 2012, xii+412 p.
(25) Bury, RB. 2011. Modifications of traps to reduce by catch of freshwater turtles. Journal of Wildlife Management. 75 (1): 3-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.31
(26) Iverson, JB. 1979. Another inexpensive turtle trap. Herpetological Review. 10 (2): 55.
(27) Kennett, R. 1992. A new trap design for catching freshwater turtles. Wildlife DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/WR9920443
Research. 19: 443-445.
(28) Kuchling, G. 2003. A new underwater trap for catching turtles. Herpetological Review. 34 (2): 126-128.
(29) Vogt, RC. 1980. New methods for trapping aquatic turtles. Copeia. 1980 (2): DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1444023
368-371.
30) Brown, DJ; Mali, I; Forstner, MRJ. 2011. No difference in short-term temporal
distribution of trapping effort on hoop-net capture efficiency for freshwater Turtles. Southeastern Naturalist. 10: 245-250.
(31) Gamble, T. 2006. The relative efficiency of basking and hoop traps for Painted Turtles (Chrysemys picta). Herpetological Review. 37 (3): 308-312.
(32) Mali, I; Brown, DJ; Jones, MC; Forstner, MRJ. 2012. Switching bait as a
method to improve freshwater turtle capture and recapture success with hoop net traps. Southeastern Naturalist. 11 (2): 311-318. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1656/058.011.0212
(33) Nall, IM; Thomas, RB. 2009. Does method of bait presentation within funnel
traps influence capture rates of semi-aquatic turtles? Herpetological Conservation and Biology. 4 (2): 161-163.
(34) Sterrett, SC; Smith, LL; Schweitzer, SH; Maerz, JC. 2010. An assessment of
two methods for sampling river turtle assemblages. Herpetological Conservation and Biology. 5 (3): 490-497.
(35) Ernst, CH. 1965. Bait preferences of some freshwater turtles. Ohio DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1562631
Herpetological Society Newsletter. 5: 53.
(36) Mali, I; Haynes, D; Forstner, MRJ. 2014. Effects of bait type, bait age, and trap hours on capture success of freshwater turtles. Southeastern Naturalist. 13 3): 619-625. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1656/058.013.0317
(37) Balestra, RAM; Valadão, RM; Vogt, RC; Bernhard, R; Ferrara, CR; Brito, ES; Arias, RB; Malvásio, A; Lustosa, APG; Souza, FL; Drummond, GM; Bassetti, LAB; Coutinho, ME; Ferreira Jr, PD; Campos, ZMS; Mendonça, SHST; Rocha, JMN; Luz, VLF. 2016. Roteiro para inventários e monitoramentos de quelônios continentais. Biodiversidade Brasileira. 6 (1): 114-152.
(38) Cagle, FR. 1939. A system of marking turtles for future identification. Copeia. 1939 (3): 170-172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1436818
(39) Pritchard, PCH; Trebbau, P. The Turtles of Venezuela. Oxford: Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles, 1984.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The author(s) retain(s) the rights to the published material. However, publication automatically implies the transfer of copyright, without payment from the journal. The author(s) transfer(s) their economic rights (the right to publish, reproduce, distribute) to the journal. The author(s) do not receive(s) financial remuneration from the Acta Biologica Brasiliensia journal for publishing; the consideration is the dissemination of their work. The author retains authorship (moral rights), but, to publish, transfers or licenses the rights of commercial/economic exploitation (economic rights) to the Acta Biologica Brasiliensia journal, free of charge, making the article open access or, in traditional models, the property of the publisher.
Revistas UFTM